Is Voice Mail on Life Support?

TechCrunch founder/Editor, Michael Arrington has a piece on voice mail which is very much on the money.

It’s on the money considering he’s presenting a viewpoint based on real world experiences. I’m pretty much in the same boat, though I don’t get nearly the number of calls that he does from public who don’t matter to me as much.

These days, those closest too me know that the best way to reach me is:

1) Schedule the signal in advance

2) shout me during off peak hours, I may actually reply the phone

3) Instant letter me and soon after turn the chat into a voice or video call

4) Send an email

5) SMS me

The last one is one of the only weaknesses of former client GrandCentral

that Arrington referenced. Post Google acquisition they never got around to implementing SMS passthrough, something that would have made the best even better.

As someone who is on either a Nokia Smartphone (the new E71 rocks and the E90 is a workhorse for me in Europe) or a Blackberry all the instance these days, I’m finding that IM on a Smartphone (Blackberry Messenger is how my Doctor wife I and tend to communicate during the day) is ideal, and even the aggregation IM tools prove valuable too. Instead of voice mail tag, the Instant Messaging (IM) or SMS basically gets me to the point of talking, not playing tag.

Bottom line-Voice mail is at a point in my life where it’s one of lowest means of communications that matters.

Original post by Andy Abramson

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
Related Articles
  • Judi Sohn Is My Hero
  • GIPS Defeats Spirit On Their Home Turf
  • Trade Shows Are Boring
  • Second Talk brings Skype to Second Life
  • Ping..Ping..Pinger
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply